stgulik: default icon (benita)
stgulik ([personal profile] stgulik) wrote2014-03-28 08:37 am
Entry tags:

What is canon anyway?

In eight or ten generations, after The Fall of Civilization, when humankind rebuilds itself from the ashes and the Harry Potter series supplants all major world religions, scholars will argue over canon in ways that make our bickering on LJ seem amateurish.

But until that fateful time, I'd like your opinion on movie canon. Is it as authentically canon as the books? When the movie version of HP7 Part 2 doesn't make it clear that Snape is not Harry Potter's father by Lily, does that idea become alternate history, or just a curiosity that ought not to be taken seriously as book canon?

Let's hear from you:

[Poll #1962449]

Do me a favor and share this poll around, because I don't have a lot of followers and I'd like some decent polling numbers on this, for science.

[identity profile] squibstress.livejournal.com 2014-03-29 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
It's a bit of an arbitrary distinction, I think, but I'm a strict book-canon girl. I look at everything else--movies, Pottermore, JKR's interviews--as a bit of fanfiction. I use those things in my own fanfic when it suits me, but it's always about the books for me.