Entry tags:
HP tarot deck
I saw these on Tumblr tonight. I don't know how new these are to the internet, but I simply love them and wanted to share with someone.
Should I attempt to print them? How should I handle the minor arcana in that case?



Should I attempt to print them? How should I handle the minor arcana in that case?



no subject
no subject
no subject
If it really drives you nuts to have no minor arcana, you could make most of the minor cards without too much difficulty. The court cards (kings, queens, etc) would be the hard part, unless you just chose to write the card titles on those cards. I did that once when I was working with rough drafts of some cards while trying to see how a computerized deck would work.
Minor cards don't need to be fancy. Decks before the Rider Waite deck (spelling from memory) had minor arcana that resembled playing cards more than symbolic pictures. Think, for example of the 5 of diamonds in a card deck. Just like that, many tarot decks had a 5 of cups card with just a pattern of 5 cups.
Fascinating HP deck by the way. Though Bellatrix as Death is just odd. The card maker must have very, very different associations with the Death card than I do.
no subject
no subject
no subject
It bugs me a bit when the minor arcana cards are just a series of cups, swords, pentacles, or wands. I prefer where an artist actually takes the time to incorporate the proper number of items into a design that represents what the card is about.
no subject
The decks I use the most have illustrations on all the minor cards, and I'll probably always read from one of them since they are easier to use. However, since decks didn't start illustrating the minor cards until the early 1900s, I don't feel cheated by a deck done in the older style as long as the packaging lets me know that that is what I'm getting. Similiarly, I have at least one major-arcana-only deck, but don't mind since I knew that's what I was getting.
no subject
no subject